Source : A. R. Simpson, A. Bergant, Journal of Hydraulic Research 32(2), 1994, pp. 183-194, figure 10
After a very fast closure, the pressure drops to vapour pressure, a cavity forms and then collapses, creating peaks higher than Joukowsky. Does CBELIER, with its cavitation model, reproduce these peaks and their timing?
A 37.2 m copper pipe slopes down to a valve closed in 10 ms, with an initial velocity of 0.76 m/s. Head is measured at the valve by a piezoelectric transducer. CBELIER uses the discrete gas cavity model (DGCM).
| Data | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Pipe: L, D, wall thickness | 37.2 m; 22 mm; 1.63 mm | PUBLISHED |
| Measured wave speed; initial velocity | 1,328 m/s; 0.76 m/s | PUBLISHED |
| Closure time; upstream reservoir head | 10 ms; 8.2 m | PUBLISHED |
| Head curve at the valve (fig. 10) | ± 1 m; ± 1 ms | READ FROM FIGURE |
| Initial head at the valve | 7.0 m | READ FROM FIGURE |
| Elevation drop (slope ≈ 1/20) | 1.86 m | DERIVED |
| Roughness; open-valve loss; linear closure | 1.5 µm; 0.5 m | ASSUMED |
| Indicator | CBELIER | Reference | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peak no. 1 | 107.0 m | 113.1 m | −5.4 % |
| Time of peak no. 1 | 0.029 s | 0.027 s | 2 ms |
| Peak no. 2 | 106.8 m | 110.2 m | −3.1 % |
| Time of peak no. 2 | 0.388 s | 0.402 s | −14 ms |
| Peak no. 3 | 110.9 m | 98.5 m | 12.6 % |
| Time of peak no. 3 | 0.702 s | 0.710 s | −8 ms |
The first two peaks are reproduced within 6 % and all the times within 15 ms. The third peak is overestimated by 13 %. The RMS difference is not a good indicator here: with almost vertical fronts, a 10 ms shift is enough to make it explode.